Our Beloved
Country
They are
unhappy warriors,
these people
driven to pry apart
our beloved country
and make
a separate
country of their own
province, these
Quebeckers
and Albertans,
disgruntled folk
who feel aggrieved
by Ottawa’s
heavy-handed
governance; and
they threaten
a referendum to
separate (which
Quebec did twice
already, and
lost; and so is Alberta
voting on
their first referendum
today); and rather than direct their
energy into
making their province
more co-independent,
these unhappy
warriors
vent their self-righteous
spleen on the
federal government
of our
beloved country.
Composed in Tiny Beaches,
Georgian Bay, Southcentral
Ontario
Monday,
October 19, 2026,
The speaker repeatedly labels the separatists as "unhappy
warriors." This phrasing subverts the traditional literary trope of the
"happy warrior"—someone who fights for a noble cause with a clear
conscience and a joyful heart. By calling them "unhappy," the speaker
strips these movements of heroism, framing the activists as inherently
miserable, combative, and destructive figures who are "driven to pry
apart" the nation.
The poem contrasts the political mechanisms of
governance with raw, negative emotions.
The Separatist Perspective: Framed
as emotional overreactions. The speaker uses visceral, derogatory language like
"disgruntled folk," "feel aggrieved," and venting their "self-righteous
spleen." (In historical literature, the spleen is the anatomical seat of
melancholy, spite, and anger).
The Federal Perspective: While
acknowledging the grievance of "Ottawa’s heavy-handed governance,"
the poem positions the federal structure as the victim of unfair hostility.
The phrase "our beloved country" is
repeated at both the beginning and the end of the poem. This repetition creates
an emotional anchor for the reader. The use of the collective pronoun "our"
establishes an inclusive, unified Canadian identity, implicitly casting the
separatists as outsiders or internal antagonists who want to dismantle a shared
home.
The poem grounds its critique in Canada's political
reality by referencing specific democratic events:
Quebec: The poem notes that Quebec "did twice
already, and lost" (referencing the actual historic referendums of 1980
and 1995).
Alberta: The poem captures a tense, immediate contemporary
moment, stating that Alberta is "voting on their first referendum
today." This implies a cycle of ongoing political unrest shifting from
East to West.
The poem captures a specific historical continuum
of Canadian political tension:
Quebec’s Referendums: Stocco
references the historical fact that Quebec held two independence referendums
(1980 and 1995) and "lost."
Alberta's Alienation: The
narrative grounds itself in a fictional or speculative contemporary moment
where Alberta is "voting on their first referendum today," mirroring
real-world conversations about "Wexit" or Alberta sovereignty.
Key Metaphors and Imagery
"Pry apart... and make a separate
country": The verb "pry" implies a violent, unnatural forcing
apart of something that is meant to be whole, emphasizing the destructive
nature of regional secession.
"Self-righteous spleen": Stocco
uses the archaic anatomical association of the spleen with anger and
bitterness. By calling it "self-righteous," he critiques the moral
superiority he believes these regional movements claim while taking out their
frustrations on the collective state.
The tone shifts between patriotic devotion
(evidenced by the repeated, affectionate refrain of "our beloved
country") and sharp dismissal of provincial critics, whom he labels as
"disgruntled folk." Ultimately, Stocco’s piece argues for a
philosophy of co-independence—suggesting that the energy of these provinces
would be better spent working collaboratively within the federal framework
rather than trying to fracture the nation.