My Beef with Secularism
not the separation
of religion
from state, but
with philosophical
secularism that
our life should be
founded on
empirical evidence rather
than religious
dogma or supernatural
beliefs. Our
life is so much more
than what we
can see, hear, smell,
taste, and
feel; our life’s a complex
reality of
never-ending surprises
that baffle
the mind. That’s my beef
with the insufferable
conceit of
philosophical secularism.
Georgian Bay, Southcentral Ontario
Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Stocco clarifies that he isn't arguing against
the political separation of church and state. His issue is
with the worldview that rejects anything beyond physical
evidence. He views this mindset as a form of intellectual limitation rather
than liberation.
2. The Rejection of Scientism
The poem challenges the notion that life should be
founded solely on empirical evidence. By calling this stance an "insufferable conceit," he suggests
that secularists are overconfident in the human ability to measure and
categorize the universe. He implies that relying only on what can be proven
"baffles" the mind by ignoring the deeper mysteries of existence.
3. The "Complex Reality"
Stocco argues that life is defined by metaphysical
depth. He posits that:
The Senses are Limited: Seeing,
hearing, and smelling are insufficient to capture the full human experience.
The Element of Surprise: He
highlights "never-ending surprises" as evidence that life is not a
predictable, mechanical process, but something more mystical or supernatural.