Saturday, May 23, 2015

29: Why be Good?


29 
 
Why be Good?         

          When I read David Brooks’ column from the New York Times (“Rather than building our careers, we should build inner character”) in my Friday, April 17, 2015 Life section of the Toronto Star, I heard my call to write a spiritual musing, “Why be Good?” But for one reason or another, I put it off; and then I picked up my Sunday, May 3, 2015 Star, which also features The New York Times International Weekly and Book Review inserts, and as the trickster spirit of coincidence would have it, Brooks’ column in the New York Times was titled “Goodness and Power,” and the Book Review insert featured a review of David Brooks’ new book The Road to Character; and, just to play with my mind a little more, after reading my papers yesterday afternoon the trickster spirit of coincidence nudged me to listen to the CBC Tapestry podcast instead of Writer’s & Company as intended, and Mary Hynes, the host of Tapestry, was interviewing David Brooks on his book The Road to Character, so here I am this morning contritely complying with my Muse to write my musing, “Why be Good?”
In his review of The Road to Character, Pico Iyer writes: “Brooks begins with a sweeping overview of the non-intersecting worlds of moral logic and economic logic, as he has it, dividing us into an ‘Adam 1,’ who seeks success in the world, and an ‘Adam 2,’ more deeply committed to character and an inner life,” and he goes on, summarizing the theme of Brooks’ book: “To nurture your Adam 1 career, it makes sense to cultivate your strengths. To nurture your Adam 2 moral core, it is necessary to confront your weaknesses.”
Brooks confesses that he wrote his book The Road to Character “to save my own soul,” and it was obvious from listening to him on Tapestry that he had invested way too much energy in his Adam 1 and not nearly enough energy in his Adam 2, and in his fifty-first year of his life he was making an honest effort to cultivate a better relationship with his Adam 2—his better self, if you will; and this brings me to the theme of today’s spiritual musing, why be good?
This is a big theme, and it would certainly seem presumptuous of me to offer an answer to a question that has vexed some of the best minds in history, but in all humility I bring a lifetime of gnostic wisdom to the table which gives me the confidence to say that when all is said and done our essential purpose in life is to simply be a good person.
This of course presupposes a lifetime of questing for the meaning and purpose of life—a personal library of thousands of books and years of commitment to various teachings; so my spiritual musings are serious reflections upon the human condition.
But to answer the question why be good? I have to call upon my creative unconscious to give me the proper image, because images are much more convincing than words will ever be; and in my mind’s eye I see life as an elaborate maze and man scrambling from one lifetime to the next to find his way out. And the man I see in the maze today is New York Times columnist David Brooks. 
 
“There is a doctrine uttered in secret that man is a prisoner who has no right to open the door of his prison and run away,” said Socrates in Plato’s Phaedo, which speaks to the perplexing nature of the human condition (the maze of life); and whether we are aware or not that we live more than one lifetime does not really matter, because we will just keep coming back to live life over again until we are ready to look for the key that opens the door to our prison.
And herein lies the mystery that David Brooks yields to with his book The Road to Character, because Adam 1 brought him success in life but Adam 2 will open the door of his prison and set him free. “Many are called, but few are chosen,” said Jesus; and David Brooks heard the call to save his soul by working upon his character and moral center.
Everyone will hear the call of Soul when life has made them ready, and David Brooks heard the call when he began to notice the distinction between Adam 1 and Adam 2 in some special people that he met serendipitously in his daily travels through life, as he tells us in his New York Times column:
“About once a month, I run across a person who radiates an inner light. These people can be in any walk of life. They seem deeply good. They listen well. They make you feel funny and valued. You often catch them looking after other people and as they do so, their laugh is musical and their manner is infused with gratitude. They are not thinking about what wonderful work they are doing. They are not thinking about themselves at all.
“When I meet such a person it brightens my whole day. But I confess I often have a sadder thought: It occurs to me that I’ve achieved a decent level of career success, but I have not achieved that. I have not achieved that generosity of spirit, or that depth of character.
“A few years ago, I realized that I wanted to be a bit more like those people. I realized that if I wanted to do that, I was going to have to work harder to save my own soul. I was going to have the sort of moral adventure that produces that kind of goodness. I was going to have to be better at balancing my life.”
I have deliberately italicized the last paragraph, because when Soul calls the voice is different; it comes from the depths of one’s own tired soul and speaks a truth that makes one shiver. David Brooks shivered when he heard the call, and he wrote The Road to Character to find the way out of his prison and bring balance to his Adam 1 and Adam 2, which speaks to the Master Key of our prison door—the liberating power of Goodness.
          Socrates, who made Goodness, the most noble of virtues, central to his philosophy said that the unexamined life is not worth living; and although that may be a bit harsh because every life serves its karmic purpose, David Brooks examined his life and realized that to have the generosity of spirit and depth of character that he needed to save his soul he’d have to have “moral adventures that produce that kind of goodness,” and his moral adventures lay in confronting himself and shifting his priorities from those that were self-serving (Adam 1), to those that were more life-serving (Adam 2). In short, David Brooks had to be less selfish and more giving, because the paradoxical dynamic of the Master Key to one’s prison door is that the more you give of yourself the more of yourself you will have to give; and, conversely, the less you give of yourself the less of yourself you will have to give. That’s what Jesus meant when he said: “He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.”
          Why be good, then? Simply, because there will come a time in one’s life, whether it be in this lifetime or the next, when one will be called upon to open the door of their personal prison; and like David Brooks, they’ll also see that the only way to open this door is to simply be a good person. 

───

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment